Evidence table — 임상 논문 핵심 결과 🆕 최근 업데이트
이 논문의 관계도
List view
Current PaperEvidenceOverviews · Radiology
Neoadjuvant / Perioperative Immunotherapy연결 근거: neoadjuvant, perioperative, resectable, pathologic response
- Methods방법론 색인 — 어떤 분석을 어떤 논문이 썼나연결어: neoadjuvant, perioperative, resectable
- ReviewClinical Oncology 종합 리뷰연결어: neoadjuvant, perioperative, resectable
- Statistics통계 방법론 리뷰연결어: neoadjuvant, perioperative, resectable
- Yang 2024Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer…연결어: neoadjuvant, perioperative, resectable
- Bang 2025Perioperative Pembrolizumab for Locally Advanced Thymic Epithelial Tumors: A Single-Arm, Phase…연결어: neoadjuvant, perioperative, pathologic response
- +56 more
Immunotherapy Response and Resistance연결 근거: pseudoprogression, dissociated response, acquired resistance, progressive disease, radiologic progression
- Methods방법론 색인 — 어떤 분석을 어떤 논문이 썼나연결어: pseudoprogression, acquired resistance, progressive disease
- ReviewClinical Oncology 종합 리뷰연결어: pseudoprogression, acquired resistance, progressive disease
- Masse 2024[18F]FDG-PET/CT atypical response patterns to immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patie…연결어: pseudoprogression, dissociated response, immune checkpoint inhibitors
- Wang 2022Spatial interplay patterns of cancer nuclei and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) predict c…연결어: progressive disease, immune checkpoint inhibitors, pembrolizumab
- Statistics통계 방법론 리뷰연결어: progressive disease, immune checkpoint inhibitors, pembrolizumab
- +47 more
Extranodal Extension Imaging연결 근거: extranodal extension, nodal
- Henson 2024Criteria for the diagnosis of extranodal extension detected on radiological imaging in head and…연결어: extranodal extension, ene, nodal
- Jang 2023Radiologic Extranodal Extension of Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung…연결어: extranodal extension, ene, nodal
- Jang 2023Radiologic Extranodal Extension of Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung…연결어: extranodal extension, ene, nodal
- Chohan 2025Pathological extranodal extension in head and neck cancer: A prognostic biomarker with therapeu…연결어: extranodal extension, ene, nodal
- ReviewClinical Oncology 종합 리뷰연결어: extranodal extension, ene, nodal
- +11 more
Radiomics and Radiogenomics연결 근거: radiomic, intratumor heterogeneity
- Methods방법론 색인 — 어떤 분석을 어떤 논문이 썼나연결어: radiomics, radiomic, radiogenomic
- ReviewBiomedical Imaging 종합 리뷰연결어: radiomics, radiomic, radiogenomic
- Statistics통계 방법론 리뷰연결어: radiomics, radiomic, radiogenomic
- Su 2023Radiogenomic-based multiomic analysis reveals imaging intratumor heterogeneity phenotypes and t…연결어: radiomics, radiomic, radiogenomic
- Henry 2022Investigation of radiomics based intra-patient inter-tumor heterogeneity and the impact of tumo…연결어: radiomics, radiomic, subsampling
- +35 more
Thoracic CT / PET Imaging연결 근거: ct, pulmonary, churg-strauss
- Methods방법론 색인 — 어떤 분석을 어떤 논문이 썼나연결어: ct, pet, pulmonary
- ReviewClinical Pulmonology 종합 리뷰연결어: ct, pet, pulmonary
- DeFreitas 2021Complications of Lung Transplantation: Update on Imaging Manifestations and Management연결어: ct, pet, pulmonary
- Cottin 2016Respiratory manifestations of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Churg-Strauss)연결어: ct, pulmonary, egpa
- ReviewBiomedical Imaging 종합 리뷰연결어: ct, pet, pulmonary
- +107 more
Shared Tags이 논문의 tags: CCRT, atezolizumab, durvalumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab
- Xu 2022Treatment-related pulmonary adverse events induced by chemoradiation and Durvalumab affect surv…공유 tag: CCRT, atezolizumab, durvalumab, nivolumab
- ReviewClinical Oncology 종합 리뷰공유 tag: CCRT, atezolizumab, durvalumab, nivolumab
- Hirsch 2017PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry Assays for Lung Cancer Results from Phase 1 of the Blueprint PD-L1 I…공유 tag: atezolizumab, durvalumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab
- Remon 2021Early and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer an update of the ESMO Clinical Practice G…공유 tag: CCRT, atezolizumab, durvalumab, nivolumab
- Methods방법론 색인 — 어떤 분석을 어떤 논문이 썼나공유 tag: CCRT, durvalumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab
- +70 more
임상 논문 133편(clinical-oncology·clinical-pulmonology)에서 연구 설계·N·primary endpoint·효과크기를 뽑아 질환별·연구 설계별로 모았습니다. 효과크기가 보고된 논문 73편. CSV 다운로드 (Excel)
> 로컬 모델(qwen3.8:27b-mlx)이 PDF 앞부분(초록·결과)에서 자동 추출했습니다. 추출한 숫자는 모두 PDF 원문과 대조했고, 원문에서 찾지 못한 값은 ⚠️로 표시했습니다(현재 5편). 빈칸은 모델이 원문에서 베낄 값을 찾지 못한 것입니다. 인용 전에는 반드시 원문으로 확인하세요. '주 분석 endpoint'는 이 논문이 주로 보고한 비교의 endpoint로, 임상시험 전체의 primary endpoint와 다를 수 있습니다(예: 최종 OS 분석 보고).
한눈에 보기
| 질환 | 전향적 연구 | 후향적 연구 | 메타분석 | 진단 정확도 | 가이드라인·리뷰 | 기타 설계 | 합계 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSCLC | 23 | 42 | 9 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 88 |
| SCLC | 2 | 2 | |||||
| 흉선 종양 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||
| 폐암 (세부 미상) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | ||
| 간질성 폐질환·섬유화 | 2 | 4 | 6 | ||||
| ARDS·중환자 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 6 | |||
| 혈관염 | 2 | 2 | |||||
| 기타 암종 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9 | ||
| 전임상(동물·세포) | 1 | 1 | |||||
| 범암종·방법론 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 10 | |||
| 기타 | 3 | 3 |
> 질환은 추출된 대상(population)과 제목의 키워드로 분류했습니다(NSCLC·SCLC·흉선·중피종·ILD·ARDS 등). 잘못 들어간 논문이 보이면 알려주세요.
NSCLC (88편)
NSCLC · 전향적 연구 (23편)
| 논문 | 설계 | N | 대상 | 비교 | 주 분석 endpoint | 효과 (95% CI) | p | 중앙 추적 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhou 2026 JAMA | RCT | 294 | Advanced NSCLC with EGFR and concurrent TP53 mutations | Osimertinib plus chemotherapy vs Osimertinib monotherapy | progression-free survival | HR 0.44 (0.32–0.60) | <.001 | 25.1 months |
| Forde 2025 New England Journal of Medicine | RCT | 358 | Patients with resectable stage IB to IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer | Neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy vs Chemotherapy alone | overall survival | HR 0.72 (0.523–0.998) | 0.048 | 68.4 months |
| Deutsch 2024 Nature Medicine | RCT | 358 | Patients with resectable non-small-cell lung carcinoma | Neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy vs Chemotherapy | Event-free survival | HR 0.18 | 29.5 months | |
| Lu 2024 The New England Journal of Medicine | RCT | 216 | Unresectable stage III EGFR-mutated NSCLC | Osimertinib vs Placebo | progression-free survival | HR 0.16 (0.10–0.24) | <0.001 | |
| Naidoo 2023 Journal of Thoracic Oncology | RCT | 35 | Unresectable stage III EGFR-mutant NSCLC | Durvalumab vs Placebo | progression-free survival | HR 0.91 (0.39–2.13) | 42.7 months | |
| Tsuboi 2023 The New England Journal of Medicine | RCT | 682 | resected, EGFR-mutated, stage IB to IIIA NSCLC | osimertinib vs placebo | overall survival | HR 0.49 (0.33–0.73) | <0.001 | |
| Forde 2022 New England Journal of Medicine | RCT | 350 | Patients with resectable stage IB to IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer | Nivolumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy vs Platinum-based chemotherapy alone | event-free survival | HR 0.63 (0.43–0.91) | 0.005 | |
| Sun 2022 Journal of Thoracic Oncology | RCT | Advanced nonsquamous NSCLC patients | Sintilimab plus pemetrexed and platinum vs Placebo plus pemetrexed and platinum | progression-free survival | HR 0.12 (0.06–0.25) | <0.001 | ||
| Spigel 2022 J Clin Oncol | RCT | 713 | Unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer patients | Durvalumab vs Placebo | overall survival | HR 0.72 (0.59–0.89) | 34.2 months | |
| Herbst 2020 The New England Journal of Medicine | RCT | 572 | Patients with metastatic NSCLC and PD-L1 expression | Atezolizumab vs Platinum-based chemotherapy | Overall survival | HR 0.59 | 0.01 | |
| Paz-Ares 2020 Annals of Oncology | RCT | 713 | Unresectable stage III NSCLC patients after chemoradiotherapy | Durvalumab vs Placebo | progression-free survival | HR 0.41 (0.26–0.65) | 33.3 months | |
| Wu 2020 The New England Journal of Medicine | RCT | 682 | completely resected EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC | osimertinib 80 mg once daily vs placebo | disease-free survival | HR 0.17 (0.11–0.26) | <0.001 | |
| Antonia 2018 The New England Journal of Medicine | RCT | 713 | Stage III, unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer patients | Durvalumab vs Placebo | overall survival | HR 0.68 (0.47–0.997) | 0.0025 | 25.2 months |
| Gandhi 2018 New England Journal of Medicine | RCT | 616 | Metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC without EGFR or ALK mutations | Pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed and platinum-based drug vs Placebo plus pemetrexed and platinum-based drug | overall survival | HR 0.49 (0.38–0.64) | <0.001 | 10.5 months |
| Hellmann 2018 The New England Journal of Medicine | RCT | ⚠️ 319 | Stage IV or recurrent NSCLC with high tumor mutational burden | Nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs Chemotherapy | progression-free survival | HR 0.58 (0.41–0.81) | <0.001 | |
| Antonia 2017 The New England Journal of Medicine | RCT | 713 | Stage III NSCLC patients after chemoradiotherapy | Durvalumab vs Placebo | progression-free survival | HR 0.52 (0.42–0.65) | <0.001 | |
| Zhang 2025 Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer | 단일군 시험 | 25 | Patients with stage 1B-3A non-small cell lung cancer | Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab | Major pathologic response | 비율 28% | ||
| Garon 2015 New England Journal of Medicine | 단일군 시험 | 495 | Patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer | Pembrolizumab | objective response rate | 비율 19.4% | ||
| Lee 2026 Lung Cancer | 전향적 코호트 | 100 | Patients with resectable stage II–III NSCLC | Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy followed by surgery vs Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy followed by non-surgical management | Event-free survival | ⚠️ difference 18.9 | 0.028 | |
| Mazzaschi 2025 Clinical Cancer Research | 전향적 코호트 | 105 | Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer undergoing immunotherapy | Oligo-acquired resistance vs Systemic acquired resistance | postprogression survival | HR 0.22 | <0.001 | |
| Haratani 2024 British Journal of Cancer | 전향적 코호트 | 135 | Unresectable Stage III NSCLC patients treated with PACIFIC regimen | Nonmild immune-related adverse events vs No immune-related adverse events | progression-free survival | HR 3.86 (1.31–11.38) | ||
| Masse 2024 European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | 전향적 코호트 | 109 | NSCLC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors | Pseudoprogression or dissociated response vs Confirmed progressive metabolic disease | overall survival | 군별: 29 vs 9 months | <0.02 | 21 months |
| Shi 2014 Journal of Thoracic Oncology | 전향적 코호트 | 1482 | Asian patients with newly diagnosed advanced lung adenocarcinoma | EGFR mutation testing | EGFR mutation frequency | 비율 51.4% |
NSCLC · 후향적 연구 (42편)
| 논문 | 설계 | N | 대상 | 비교 | 주 분석 endpoint | 효과 (95% CI) | p | 중앙 추적 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Takeda 2026 Clinical Lung Cancer | 후향적 코호트 | 1439 | Patients with locally advanced NSCLC receiving durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy | Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy | overall survival | |||
| Takeda 2026 Clinical Lung Cancer | 후향적 코호트 | 1439 | Patients with locally advanced NSCLC receiving durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy | Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy | overall survival | |||
| Tran 2026 Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer | 후향적 코호트 | 2300 | Patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer | Machine learning model of circulating tumor antigens vs Radiographic imaging | 1-year overall survival | 0.73 | ||
| Ahn 2025 Radiology | 후향적 코호트 | 2026 | Stage I non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing sublobar resection | Preoperative percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy vs No preoperative percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy | freedom from overall recurrence | HR 1.49 (1.03–2.17) | .03 | |
| Crespi 2025 Lung Cancer | 후향적 코호트 | 122 | Stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer patients | Subsequent treatment strategies vs None | Treatment strategies and clinical outcomes after durvalumab progression | |||
| Wheatley-Price 2025 Lung Cancer | 후향적 코호트 | 487 | Unresectable, stage III NSCLC patients | CRT followed by durvalumab vs CRT alone | overall survival | 43.1 and 35.8 months | ||
| Shoshihara 2025 Lung Cancer | 후향적 코호트 | 194 | Advanced NSCLC patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 1% | Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy vs Pembrolizumab monotherapy | overall survival | HR 0.67 (0.46–0.96) | 42.8 and 44.1 months | |
| Liu 2024 Scientific Reports | 후향적 코호트 | 231 | Stage IB-IIIB lung squamous cell carcinoma | Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy vs Neoadjuvant chemotherapy | pathological response | OR 7.406 (3.054–17.960) | <0.001 | |
| Mooradian 2024 JAMA Network Open | 후향적 코호트 | 469 | Unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer patients | Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy vs No durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy | time to first subsequent therapy or death | HR 0.36 (0.26–0.51) | ||
| Nie 2024 BMC Medicine | 후향적 코호트 | 7021 | Advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients | Obesity vs Non-obesity | overall survival | HR 0.84 (0.76–0.93) | ||
| Sugimoto 2024 Scientific Reports | 후향적 코호트 | ⚠️ 154 | Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients | Durvalumab consolidation therapy after chemoradiotherapy vs Chemoradiotherapy alone | progression-free survival | HR 0.44 (0.22–0.88) | 0.020 | |
| Yang 2024 The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 후향적 코호트 | 1092 | Patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer | Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy vs Neoadjuvant chemotherapy | disease-free survival | HR 0.50 (0.38–0.68) | <.001 | |
| Jang 2023 American Journal of Roentgenology | 후향적 코호트 | 382 | Patients with non-small cell lung cancer and clinical N1 or N2 disease | Radiologic unambiguous extranodal extension vs No radiologic extranodal extension | overall survival | HR 1.72 | .008 | |
| Jang 2023 American Journal of Roentgenology | 후향적 코호트 | 382 | Patients with non-small cell lung cancer and clinical N1 or N2 disease | Radiologic unambiguous extranodal extension vs No radiologic extranodal extension | overall survival | HR 1.72 | .008 | |
| Leshem 2023 Cancer | 후향적 코호트 | 203 | Metastatic NSCLC patients treated with first-line pembrolizumab | Diabetes mellitus vs No diabetes mellitus | progression-free survival | HR 1.67 (1.11–2.50) | .01 | |
| Moore 2023 Curr. Oncol. | 후향적 코호트 | 935 | Adults with unresectable stage III NSCLC in VHA | Durvalumab | Durvalumab treatment patterns | 비율 59% | ||
| Park 2023 Journal of Thoracic Oncology | 후향적 코호트 | 157 | Patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC | Durvalumab consolidation after chemoradiotherapy | real-world progression-free survival | 25.9 months | 19.1 months | |
| Pennock 2023 Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology | 후향적 코호트 | 59 | Patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy | Adjuvant durvalumab vs None | progression-free survival | 군별: 100% v. 40% | <0.001 | 29 months |
| Potter 2023 The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 후향적 코호트 | 497 | Patients with pathologic stage I-II NSCLC undergoing complete resection in NLST | Lung cancer detected by low-dose computed tomography screening vs Lung cancer detected by chest radiography or not detected by screening | Recurrence | 4.9 (4.0–6.0) | <.001 | 4.0 years |
| Stana 2023 Cancers | 후향적 코호트 | 112 | Patients with inoperable NSCLC stage III | Pre-treatment DLCO < 60% vs Pre-treatment DLCO >= 60% | Pneumonitis | 0.175 | 0.042 | |
| N 2023 Journal of Thoracic Oncology | 후향적 코호트 | 1399 | Patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC | Durvalumab | real-world progression-free survival | 21.7 months | 23.5 mo | |
| Bryant 2022 European Journal of Cancer | 후향적 코호트 | 1006 | Stage III non-small cell lung cancer patients | Adjuvant durvalumab 9 months vs Adjuvant durvalumab 12 months | progression-free survival | |||
| Bryant 2022 European Journal of Cancer | 후향적 코호트 | 1006 | Stage III non-small cell lung cancer patients | Adjuvant durvalumab treatment duration (6, 9, or 12 months) vs 12 months of durvalumab treatment | progression-free survival | |||
| Chen 2022 Thorac Cancer | 후향적 코호트 | 44 | Stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer patients | Neoadjuvant immunotherapy vs None | Major pathological response | 비율 63.6% | ||
| Gao 2022 Lung Cancer | 후향적 코호트 | 190 | Locally advanced NSCLC patients treated with chemoradiation and durvalumab | Chemoradiation followed by durvalumab | Grade 2+ pneumonitis | 비율 26.3% | 14.8 months | |
| Vanguri 2022 Nature Cancer | 후향적 코호트 | 247 | Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer | Multimodal machine learning model vs Unimodal measures (TMB, PD-L1 IHC) | Prediction of immunotherapy response | AUC 0.80 (0.74–0.86) | ||
| Haque 2022 Acta Oncologica | 후향적 코호트 | 109,964 | cN0 cM0 non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing surgery | Surgical resection with lymph node dissection vs None | Occult lymph node involvement | 비율 13.2% | ||
| Kang 2022 Cancer Research and Treatment | 후향적 코호트 | 59 | Stage IV NSCLC patients with concurrent subsolid nodules | EGFR-TKI therapy vs No EGFR-TKI therapy | Size decrease of concurrent subsolid nodules | OR 4.29 (1.21–15.29) | 0.025 | |
| Park 2022 Journal of Clinical Oncology | 후향적 코호트 | 518 | Patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer | AI-powered spatial analysis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes vs None | progression-free survival | 군별: 4.1 vs 2.2 vs 2.4 months | ||
| She 2022 EBioMedicine | 후향적 코호트 | 274 | NSCLC patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy | Deep learning model based on CT images vs None | Major pathological response | AUC 0.73 (0.58–0.86) | ||
| Sumitomo 2022 Oncology Reports | 후향적 코호트 | 175 | 175 patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer | PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression analysis vs None | Association of TIL and M2 TAM densities with PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression | <0.0001 | ||
| Takeda 2022 Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology | 후향적 코호트 | 107 | Patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer | Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy followed by durvalumab | progression-free survival | 29.7 months | ||
| Xu 2022 Radiotherapy and Oncology | 후향적 코호트 | 326 | Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients | Chemoradiotherapy plus consolidation immune checkpoint inhibitor vs Chemoradiotherapy | Overall survival | HR 0.53 (0.36–0.78) | 0.001 | |
| Kim 2021 Cancers | 후향적 코호트 | 219 | Stage III non-small cell lung cancer patients | Pencil beam scanning proton therapy vs Intensity-modulated radiation therapy | locoregional control | 군별: 72.1% and 84.1% | 0.287 | 21.7 months |
| Saito 2021 Lung Cancer | 후향적 코호트 | 302 | Patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy | Chemoradiotherapy and durvalumab consolidation vs None | Symptomatic pneumonitis | OR 2.37 | 0.008 | 8.4 months |
| Shaverdian 2021 JTO Clinical and Research Reports | 후향적 코호트 | 113 | Stage III NSCLC patients treated with cCRT and durvalumab | Early discontinuation of durvalumab (<2.1 months) vs Late discontinuation of durvalumab (>=2.1 months) | progression-free survival | HR 0.52 (0.31–0.88) | 0.014 | 23.3 months |
| Topp 2021 Annals of Oncology | 후향적 코호트 | 1194 | Patients with advanced melanoma, NSCLC, or G/GEJ cancer | Pembrolizumab monotherapy | Lesion-level heterogeneity of radiologic progression | |||
| Jung 2020 Lung Cancer | 후향적 코호트 | 61 | Patients with unresectable locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer | Durvalumab consolidation vs Observation | progression-free survival | |||
| Saito 2020 Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology | 후향적 코호트 | 36 | Patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer | Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by durvalumab vs None | Incidence of grade ≥2 radiation pneumonitis | 비율 36% | 7 months | |
| Shin 2019 European Respiratory Journal | 후향적 코호트 | 1337 | NSCLC patients with radiological N0 disease | Central tumour defined as inner one-third of hemithorax (concentric lines from midline) vs Other central tumour definitions | occult mediastinal lymph node metastasis | OR 2.13 (1.17–3.87) | 0.013 | |
| Park 2018 Journal of Thoracic Oncology | 후향적 코호트 | 16 | Patients with lung adenocarcinoma and synchronous ground-glass/lepidic nodules | Targeted sequencing analysis | Genetic independence of synchronous lesions | |||
| Reiniger 2019 Acta Oncologica | 단면 | 268 | Lung adenocarcinoma patients | Tumor necrosis presence vs No tumor necrosis | PD-L1 expression of tumor cells and PD-1 expression of immune cells |
NSCLC · 메타분석 (9편)
| 논문 | 설계 | N | 대상 | 비교 | 주 분석 endpoint | 효과 (95% CI) | p | 중앙 추적 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adar 2026 Lung Cancer | 메타분석 | Early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients | Sublobar resection vs Stereotactic body radiation therapy | overall survival | HR 1.51 (1.18–1.93) | |||
| Guerrera 2025 Lung Cancer | 메타분석 | 10,493 | Patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer | Neoadjuvant immunotherapy protocols vs Adjuvant and perioperative immunotherapy protocols | Protocol compliance | 0.78 (0.70–0.85) | ||
| Rajaram 2024 Chest | 메타분석 | 60,695 | Patients with stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer | Surgical resection | Recurrence-free survival | 비율 96% | ||
| Sorin 2024 JAMA Oncology | 메타분석 | 5431 | Patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer | Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy vs Neoadjuvant chemotherapy | overall survival | HR 0.65 (0.54–0.79) | ||
| Zhou 2024 JAMA Network Open | 메타분석 | 2385 | Patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer | Neoadjuvant-adjuvant PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors vs Neoadjuvant-only PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors | event-free survival | HR 0.90 (0.63–1.30) | .59 | |
| Huyuk 2023 Histopathology | 메타분석 | Stage I-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer patients | Lymph node micrometastasis detected by ancillary techniques vs No lymph node micrometastasis | overall survival | 비율 20% | |||
| Wang 2022 Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys | 메타분석 | 1885 | Stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer patients | Consolidation durvalumab after chemoradiation therapy | 12-month overall survival | 비율 90% (83%–98%) | ||
| Liu 2021 Journal of Thoracic Oncology | 메타분석 | 8278 | Patients with advanced NSCLC | First-line immunotherapy combinations vs Other treatments | overall survival | HR 0.96 (0.72–1.29) | ||
| Nam 2021 Korean Journal of Radiology | 메타분석 | 2232 | Patients with non-small cell lung cancer | Percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy | tissue adequacy rate | 비율 89.3% (85.6%–92.6%) |
NSCLC · 진단 정확도 (1편)
| 논문 | 설계 | N | 대상 | 비교 | 주 분석 endpoint | 효과 (95% CI) | p | 중앙 추적 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hirsch 2017 Journal of Thoracic Oncology | 진단정확도 | 39 | NSCLC tumors | 22C3, 28-8, SP142, SP263 PD-L1 IHC assays vs None | PD-L1 classification agreement | 비율 37% |
NSCLC · 가이드라인·리뷰 (9편)
- Riely 2026 (가이드라인) — Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 4.2026, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines In Oncology · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
- Riely 2024 (가이드라인) — Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 4.2024, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
- Remon 2021 (가이드라인) — Early and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer an update of the ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines focusing on diagnosis, staging, systemic and local therapy · Annals of Oncology
- Wang 2023 (리뷰) — Advances in efficacy prediction and monitoring of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer · Frontiers in Oncology
- Britt 2022 (리뷰) — Hyperprogressive disease in non-small cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, fact or myth? · Frontiers in Oncology
- Hao 2022 (리뷰) — Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis in non-small cell lung cancer: A review · Frontiers in Oncology
- Koomen 2020 (리뷰) — Comparability of PD‐L1 immunohistochemistry assays for non‐small‐cell lung cancer a systematic review · Histopathology
- Ferrara 2019 (리뷰) — Pseudoprogression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer upon Immunotherapy: Few Drops in the Ocean? · Journal of Thoracic Oncology
- Subramanian 2013 (리뷰) — Review of ongoing clinical trials in non-small-cell lung cancer: a status report for 2012 from the ClinicalTrials.gov Web site · Journal of Thoracic Oncology
NSCLC · 기타 설계 (4편)
| 논문 | 설계 | N | 대상 | 비교 | 주 분석 endpoint | 효과 (95% CI) | p | 중앙 추적 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chen 2021 | 기타 | 1 | 32-year-old female never-smoker with late-stage lung adenocarcinoma | Whole-exome sequencing, DNA methylation, and TCR sequencing | Immunogenomic intertumor heterogeneity | |||
| Rocha 2018 Journal of Thoracic Oncology | 기타 | 1 | 65-year-old male with stage IV squamous NSCLC | Nivolumab | ||||
| Goldstraw 2016 Journal of Thoracic Oncology | 기타 | 94,708 | Patients with non-small cell lung cancer | Proposed 8th edition TNM stage groupings vs 7th edition TNM stage groupings | overall survival | |||
| Noman 2012 Cancer Research | 기타 | Human NSCLC and melanoma cell lines | miR-210 attenuation vs Hypoxic tumor cells | Susceptibility to CTL-mediated lysis |
SCLC (2편)
SCLC · 후향적 연구 (2편)
| 논문 | 설계 | N | 대상 | 비교 | 주 분석 endpoint | 효과 (95% CI) | p | 중앙 추적 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gao 2026 Lung Cancer | 후향적 코호트 | 163 | Patients with transformed small-cell lung cancer | First-line EGFR-TKI plus chemotherapy vs Chemotherapy alone, immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy | progression-free survival | 군별: 6.2, 5.30, 4.07 months | 0.041 | |
| Chen 2025 Lung Cancer | 후향적 코호트 | 206 | Patients with transformed or primary small-cell lung cancer | Transformed small-cell lung cancer vs Primary small-cell lung cancer | overall survival | 0.033 |
흉선 종양 (2편)
흉선 종양 · 전향적 연구 (1편)
| 논문 | 설계 | N | 대상 | 비교 | 주 분석 endpoint | 효과 (95% CI) | p | 중앙 추적 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bang 2025 Journal of Thoracic Oncology | 단일군 시험 | 40 | Patients with potentially resectable locally advanced thymic epithelial tumors | Neoadjuvant docetaxel, cisplatin, and pembrolizumab followed by surgery and maintenance pembrolizumab | major pathologic response | 비율 46.4% | 27.5 months |
흉선 종양 · 후향적 연구 (1편)
| 논문 | 설계 | N | 대상 | 비교 | 주 분석 endpoint | 효과 (95% CI) | p | 중앙 추적 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeong 2017 AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology | 후향적 코호트 | 50 | Patients with histologically proven thymic epithelial tumors | 3D volumetry and longest diameter measurement vs None | Volume doubling time | AUC 0.873 | <0.01 |
폐암 (세부 미상) (4편)
폐암 (세부 미상) · 후향적 연구 (1편)
| 논문 | 설계 | N | 대상 | 비교 | 주 분석 endpoint | 효과 (95% CI) | p | 중앙 추적 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Licker 2006 The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 후향적 코호트 | 1222 | Patients undergoing lung cancer resection | Preoperative FEV1 less than 60% vs Preoperative FEV1 60% or greater | 30-day mortality | ⚠️ OR 1.9 (1.2–3.9) |
폐암 (세부 미상) · 진단 정확도 (1편)
| 논문 | 설계 | N | 대상 | 비교 | 주 분석 endpoint | 효과 (95% CI) | p | 중앙 추적 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oh 2024 ONCOLOGY LETTERS | 진단정확도 | 101 | Patients with suspected lung cancer | PCDHGA12 and PRRX1 methylation detection vs Cytology | Diagnostic accuracy for lung cancer | AUC 0.891 |
폐암 (세부 미상) · 가이드라인·리뷰 (1편)
- Park 2021 (리뷰) — Lung Cancer in Korea · Journal of Thoracic Oncology
폐암 (세부 미상) · 기타 설계 (1편)
| 논문 | 설계 | N | 대상 | 비교 | 주 분석 endpoint | 효과 (95% CI) | p | 중앙 추적 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wang 2019 Nature Communications | 기타 | 37 | Lung cancer patients treated with pembrolizumab | AhR expression analysis vs None | Response to immunotherapy | 비율 81.3% |
간질성 폐질환·섬유화 (6편)
간질성 폐질환·섬유화 · 후향적 연구 (2편)
| 논문 | 설계 | N | 대상 | 비교 | 주 분석 endpoint | 효과 (95% CI) | p | 중앙 추적 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Park 2026 CHEST | 후향적 코호트 | 476 | Patients with non-IPF fibrosing interstitial lung disease | Exceeding 1-year minimal clinically important difference in fibrosis score vs Not exceeding 1-year minimal clinically important difference in fibrosis score | transplant-free survival | HR 3.01 (2.19–4.14) | ||
| Lee 2025 European Radiology | 후향적 코호트 | 465 | ILD patients | Deep learning-based quantitative CT vs None | Progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease | OR 1.096 (1.042–1.152) | <0.001 |
간질성 폐질환·섬유화 · 가이드라인·리뷰 (4편)
- Ryerson 2025 (가이드라인) — Update of the international multidisciplinary classification of the interstitial pneumonias: an ERS/ATS statement · European Respiratory Journal
- Harrison 2024 (리뷰) — Drug-induced interstitial lung disease a narrative review of a clinical conundrum · Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine
- Cherian 2022 (리뷰) — Algorithmic Approach to the Diagnosis of Organizing Pneumonia · CHEST
- Mehrjardi 2017 (리뷰) — Radio-pathological correlation of organizing pneumonia (OP): a pictorial review · Br J Radiol
ARDS·중환자 (6편)
ARDS·중환자 · 후향적 연구 (1편)
| 논문 | 설계 | N | 대상 | 비교 | 주 분석 endpoint | 효과 (95% CI) | p | 중앙 추적 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palumbo 2021 Journal of Critical Care | 환자-대조군 | 173 | Invasively ventilated COVID-19 ARDS patients | Macklin effect on baseline CT vs Absence of Macklin effect | Pneumomediastinum/pneumothorax development | AUC 0.924 | <0.001 |
ARDS·중환자 · 가이드라인·리뷰 (4편)
- Tasaka 2022 (가이드라인) — ARDS Clinical Practice Guideline 2021 · Journal of Intensive Care
- Bitker 2022 (리뷰) — Imaging the acute respiratory distress syndrome: past, present and future · Intensive Care Med
- Ware 2022 (리뷰) — Acute respiratory distress syndrome causes, pathophysiology, and phenotypes · The Lancet
- Gorman 2022 (리뷰) — Acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults: diagnosis, outcomes, long-term sequelae, and management · The Lancet
ARDS·중환자 · 기타 설계 (1편)
| 논문 | 설계 | N | 대상 | 비교 | 주 분석 endpoint | 효과 (95% CI) | p | 중앙 추적 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belletti 2022 Intensive Care Med | 기타 |
혈관염 (2편)
혈관염 · 후향적 연구 (2편)
| 논문 | 설계 | N | 대상 | 비교 | 주 분석 endpoint | 효과 (95% CI) | p | 중앙 추적 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cottin 2016 European Respiratory Journal | 후향적 코호트 | 157 | Patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis | Corticosteroids vs None | Asthma severity and persistent airflow obstruction | 비율 57% | ||
| Kim 2007 European Radiology | 후향적 코호트 | 25 | Patients with Churg-Strauss syndrome | Thin-section CT analysis vs Clinical and histopathologic findings | CT findings correlation with clinical and pathologic data |
기타 암종 (9편)
기타 암종 · 전향적 연구 (3편)
| 논문 | 설계 | N | 대상 | 비교 | 주 분석 endpoint | 효과 (95% CI) | p | 중앙 추적 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jung 2024 Journal of Breast Cancer | 단일군 시험 | Breast cancer patients with predicted pCR after neoadjuvant systemic therapy | Omission of breast surgery vs Patients with pCR who underwent breast surgery in previous studies | 5-year disease-free survival | ||||
| Li 2026 npj Digital Medicine | 전향적 코호트 | 1,475 | HCC patients after curative-intent resection | TEMPO-HCC multimodal deep learning model vs Unimodal models and guideline-based staging systems | Overall survival | AUC 0.836 | ||
| Reuben 2017 npj Genomic Medicine | 전향적 코호트 | 60 | Metastatic melanoma patients | Targeted therapy or immune checkpoint blockade vs None | Intrapatient heterogeneity in therapeutic response | 비율 83% |
기타 암종 · 후향적 연구 (2편)
| 논문 | 설계 | N | 대상 | 비교 | 주 분석 endpoint | 효과 (95% CI) | p | 중앙 추적 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deng 2020 Cancer Management and Research | 후향적 코호트 | 212 | Nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients | PD-L1 expression vs Tumor-associated macrophage infiltration | Association between PD-L1 expression and TAM density | 0.0012 | 75 months | |
| Jeong 2020 Korean J Radiol | 후향적 코호트 | 93 | Patients with single hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing radiofrequency ablation | Use of perfluorobutane microbubbles (Sonazoid) vs No use of perfluorobutane microbubbles | Popping phenomenon | OR 0.10 | 0.048 |
기타 암종 · 가이드라인·리뷰 (3편)
- Chohan 2025 (리뷰) — Pathological extranodal extension in head and neck cancer: A prognostic biomarker with therapeutic ramifications and diagnostic pitfalls · Pathology - Research and Practice
- Loi 2021 (리뷰) — The journey of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes as a biomarker in breast cancer: clinical utility in an era of checkpoint inhibition · Annals of Oncology
- Wu 2021 (리뷰) — Intratumor heterogeneity: the hidden barrier to immunotherapy against MSI tumors from the perspective of IFN-gamma signaling and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes · Journal of Hematology & Oncology
기타 암종 · 기타 설계 (1편)
| 논문 | 설계 | N | 대상 | 비교 | 주 분석 endpoint | 효과 (95% CI) | p | 중앙 추적 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hasina 2008 Lab Invest | 기타 | Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients | Gene expression profiling and immunohistochemistry | Angiogenic heterogeneity |
전임상(동물·세포) (1편)
전임상(동물·세포) · 기타 설계 (1편)
| 논문 | 설계 | N | 대상 | 비교 | 주 분석 endpoint | 효과 (95% CI) | p | 중앙 추적 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xiong 2019 Cancer Research | 기타 | Tumor-bearing mice | Anti-PD-L1 treatment vs Isotype control | Macrophage phenotype remodeling |
범암종·방법론 (10편)
범암종·방법론 · 후향적 연구 (1편)
| 논문 | 설계 | N | 대상 | 비교 | 주 분석 endpoint | 효과 (95% CI) | p | 중앙 추적 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saal 2025 JAMA Oncology | 후향적 코호트 | 1377 | Patients with solid tumors treated with atezolizumab | Low-risk or intermediate-risk PD patterns vs High-risk PD patterns | postprogressionsurvival | HR 0.23 (0.13–0.41) | < .001 |
범암종·방법론 · 메타분석 (1편)
| 논문 | 설계 | N | 대상 | 비교 | 주 분석 endpoint | 효과 (95% CI) | p | 중앙 추적 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim 2019 The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine | 메타분석 | ⚠️ 623 | Patients with solid tumors | Metabolic criteria (EORTC or PERCIST) vs Morphologic criteria (RECIST) | Overall response rate | 비율 25% | <0.0001 |
범암종·방법론 · 가이드라인·리뷰 (8편)
- Amin 2017 (가이드라인) — The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual Continuing to build a bridge from a population‐based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging · CA Cancer J Clin
- Amin 2017 (가이드라인) — The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more \"personalized\" approach to cancer staging · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
- Eisenhauer 2009 (가이드라인) — New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) · European Journal of Cancer
- Awada 2025 (리뷰) — The rapidly evolving paradigm of neoadjuvant immunotherapy across cancer types · Nature Cancer
- Rabas 2024 (리뷰) — Cancer-induced systemic pre-conditioning of distant organs: building a niche for metastatic cells · Nature Reviews Cancer
- Hanahan 2022 (리뷰) — Hallmarks of Cancer: New Dimensions · Cancer Discovery
- Janjigian 2021 (리뷰) — Eradicating micrometastases with immune checkpoint blockade: Strike while the iron is hot · Cancer Cell
- Sung 2021 (리뷰) — Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
기타 (3편)
기타 · 가이드라인·리뷰 (3편)
- Johkoh 2011 (가이드라인) — Chest CT Diagnosis and Clinical Management of Drug-related Pneumonitis in Patients Receiving Molecular Targeting Agents and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Position Paper from the Fleischner Society · Radiology
- Suresh 2024 (리뷰) — Pulmonary toxicity of immune checkpoint immunotherapy · J Clin Invest
- Wekerle 2017 (리뷰) — Immune tolerance in transplantation · Clinical and Experimental Immunology